Pendugaan Zona Alterasi Hidrotermal Menggunakan Data Geomagnetik EMM 2017 Di Wilayah Lubuk Sikaping

Authors

  • Fauzan Surya Nanda Departemen Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Andalas
  • Arif Budiman Departemen Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jfu.14.6.623-629.2025

Keywords:

Hydrothermal alteration , Geomagnetic, EMM 2017, Magnetic Anomaly

Abstract

This study aims to identify hydrothermal alteration zones in Lubuk Sikaping District, Pasaman Regency, West Sumatra, using Enhanced Magnetic Model (EMM) 2017 geomagnetic data developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The data processing stages include International Geomagnetic Referee Field (IGRF) correction, evaluation of regional and residual anomalies using Radial Average Power Spectrum (RAPS), reduction to the poles, analysis of magnetic anomaly values ​​with the geological conditions of the study area. The results show that residual magnetic anomalies are in the range of -7.09582 nT to 7.65333 nT. The results of the analysis of magnetic anomaly values ​​and geological conditions indicate that the high anomaly zone (3.12460 nT - 7.65333 nT) spread in the south and southwest is a mineralization zone. The moderate anomaly zone (0.07503 nT - 3.12460) spread in the central to northeast is a lithology preservation zone between magnetic igneous rocks and non-magnetic sedimentary rocks. The low anomaly zone (–7.09582 nT - 0.07503 nT) located in the north and northeast is a hydrothermal alteration zone. The presence of mineralization zones, lithology boundary zones and hydrothermal alteration zones indicates that there is a fluid migration path in this area. The hydrothermal alteration zone in Lubuk Sikaping District is associated with the Sarik-Gajah Formation which consists of volcanic rocks that have undergone alteration due to the presence of active structures of the Sumatran Fault System.

References

Baranov, V., 1957, A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: Pseudo-gravimetric anomalies, Geophysics, 22(2), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438369.

Baranov, V., & Naudy, H., 1964, Numerical calculation of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole, Geophysics, 29(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439334.

Chulliat, A., Brown, W., Alken, P., Beggan, C., Nair, M., Cox, G., Woods, A., Macmillan, S., Meyer, B., Paniccia, M., et al. (2020). The US/UK World Magnetic Model (2020–2025). https://doi.org/10.25923/ytk1-yx35.

Corbett, G. J., & Leach, T. M. (1997). Southwest Pacific Rim gold-copper systems. Society of Economic Geologists. https://doi.org/10.5382/sp.06.

Cox, M. E., & Browne, P. (1998). Hydrothermal alteration mineralogy as an indicator of hydrology at the Ngawha geothermal field, New Zealand. Geothermics, 27(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(97)10015-3.

Direktorat Panas Bumi. (2017). Buku panas bumi. Direktorat Jenderal Energi Baru, Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energi.

Gabr, S. S., Diab, H., Abdel Fattah, T. A., Sadek, M. F., Khalil, K. I., & Youssef, M. A. S. (2022). Aeromagnetic and Landsat-8 data interpretation for structural and hydrothermal alteration mapping along the Central and Southern Eastern Desert boundary, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 25(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.12.002

Gubbins, D., & Herrero-Bervera, E. (2007). Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism. Springer.

Hunt, C. P., Moskowitz, B. M., & Banerjee, S. K. (1995). Rock physics & phase relations: A handbook of physical constants. American Geophysical Union.

Joni, W., & Hermawan, D. (2020). Bonjol geothermal structure based on 2D inversion of magnetotelluric data. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 417, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/417/1/012002

Kementerian ESDM, Kencono, A. W., Dwinugroho, M., Satra Baruna, E., & Ajiwihanto, N. (2023). Handbook of energy & economic statistics of Indonesia 2015 (p. 73).

Lagat, J. (2007). Hydrothermal alteration mineralogy in geothermal fields with case examples from Olkaria domes geothermal field, Kenya. Short Course II on Surface Exploration for Geothermal Resources, 1–24.

Lumbanbatu, U. M. (2009). Morfogenetik daerah Lubuk Sikaping Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Geologi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, 19(2), 79–93.

Meyer, B., Chulliat, A., & Saltus, R. (2017). Derivation and error analysis of the Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid at 2 arc min resolution version 3 (EMAG2v3). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18(12), 4522–4537. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC007280

Permana, N. R., Gunawan, B., Primastika, A. A., Shafa, D., Fadrian, D. F., & Zani, F. R. (2022). Identification of alteration zone and gold mineralization based on magnetic anomaly and 3D model of geomagnetic satellite data inversion of Mount Pongkor Area, West Java. Journal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Research, 8(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.21580/jnsmr.2022.8.2.13177

Pirajno, F. (2009). Hydrothermal processes and mineral systems. Springer.

Langel, R. A., & Hinze, W. J. (1998). The magnetic field of the Earth’s lithosphere: The satellite perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., & Sheriff, R. E. (1990). Applied geophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Vervelidou, F., Thébault, E., & Korte, M. (2018). A high-resolution lithospheric magnetic field model over southern Africa based on a joint inversion of CHAMP, Swarm, WDMAM, and ground magnetic field data. Solid Earth, 9(3), 897–910. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-897-2018

Wibisono, P. A., & Herdianita, N. R. (2020). Hydrothermal alteration and fluid characteristics study of Panti Geothermal Field, Pasaman Regency, West Sumatra, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 500(1), 012022.

Downloads

Published

24-11-2025

How to Cite

Nanda, F. S., & Budiman, A. (2025). Pendugaan Zona Alterasi Hidrotermal Menggunakan Data Geomagnetik EMM 2017 Di Wilayah Lubuk Sikaping. Jurnal Fisika Unand, 14(6), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.25077/jfu.14.6.623-629.2025

Issue

Section

Articles